Dallas Fort Worth Injury Lawyer Blog
Asbestos Dangers Cover-Up. In this article, I’ll address the asbestos mining and manufacturing companies that were involved in the massive cover-up over the dangers of Asbestos. These companies clearly put profits before people.
Asbestos Dangers Cover-Up linked to catastrophic lung disease and cancer.
- Early Knowledge and Suppression of Information: Internal documents and medical studies dating back to the early 20th century showed that industry leaders were aware of the harmful effects of asbestos exposure, including lung damage and cancer. However, many companies actively suppressed this information, discredited scientific studies, and lobbied against safety regulations.
- Health Risks and Asbestos Workers: Workers in industries that handled asbestos were not informed about the risks, and protective measures were rarely implemented. This led to widespread health issues, including asbestosis, lung cancer, and mesothelioma, often manifesting decades after the initial exposure.
- Regulatory Battles and Public Awareness: It wasn’t until the 1970s and 1980s that significant public awareness and regulatory actions began to take shape, largely due to advocacy by affected workers and public health activists. Prior to this, the asbestos industry had a significant influence on regulatory bodies, hindering the establishment of stringent exposure limits and safety standards.
- Legal Repercussions and Compensation: The concealment of asbestos risks led to numerous legal battles. Companies faced lawsuits for negligence and wrongful death. Many were required to pay large settlements or establish trust funds to compensate victims of asbestos exposure.
- Global Perspective: While many Western countries have now heavily regulated or banned the use of asbestos, the cover-up and its repercussions are a global issue. Some countries still mine, import, and use asbestos, and the legacy of past exposures continues to impact public health worldwide.
The asbestos danger cover-up is a stark reminder of the need for transparency, ethical practices in industry, and robust regulatory oversight to protect public health.
The Asbestos Companies Knew of the Dangers of Asbestos
Many medical experts and scientists established a link between asbestos and lung cancer in the 1930s. Also, during the same time, doctors determined that mesothelioma, an aggressive cancer of the lining of the lungs was caused almost exclusively by asbestos.
As the evidence of asbestos’s catastrophic side effects piled up, so did the influence of the asbestos companies, both directly to workers and consumers. Between 1940 and 1980, the asbestos mining and manufacturing business expanded into a multibillion-dollar industry that employed more than 200,000 people.
The financial success of these asbestos mining and manufacturing companies depended on keeping the serious health risks of asbestos hidden. It was the asbestos miners, workers and consumers who paid the ultimate price. To keep the asbestos industry prosperous, many companies took devious methods to keep the secret and the asbestos miners, factory workers and the public were not notified about the real dangers of asbestos.
Listed below are four asbestos related companies and their role in the cover-up of the real dangers of asbestos.
- Early Knowledge of Health Risks: Johns Manville was aware of the harmful effects of asbestos on health as early as the 1930s. Internal memos and correspondence indicated that the company had knowledge of workers suffering from asbestos-related diseases, yet they chose not to inform their employees or the public about these risks.
- Suppressing Information: The company reportedly suppressed scientific data and studies that demonstrated the health hazards of asbestos. They were also involved in efforts to minimize the perceived danger of asbestos in public and regulatory arenas.
- Legal Battles and Bankruptcy: By the 1970s and 1980s, former workers and their families began suing Johns Manville for asbestos-related diseases. The number of lawsuits grew rapidly, eventually leading the company to file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in 1982. This was a landmark event as it was one of the largest bankruptcy filings in U.S. history at the time, primarily due to asbestos litigation.
- Establishment of the Manville Personal Injury Settlement Trust: As part of its bankruptcy reorganization, Johns Manville established the Manville Personal Injury Settlement Trust in 1988. This was one of the first trust funds of its kind, set up to compensate victims of asbestos exposure. The establishment of this trust fund marked a significant moment in the legal and corporate management of asbestos liabilities.
- Impact and Legacy: Johns Manville’s role in the asbestos dangers cover-up had a lasting impact on public health, corporate accountability, and the legal landscape surrounding asbestos litigation. The company’s history with asbestos has served as a case study in the dangers of corporate malfeasance and the importance of ethical responsibility to workers’ safety and public health.
Johns Manville’s actions contributed significantly to the broader narrative of the asbestos industry’s efforts to hide the dangers of asbestos exposure, highlighting the need for corporate transparency and stronger regulatory protections for workers and the public.
- Medical Research and Consultation: MetLife had a close association with asbestos manufacturing companies, including Johns Manville. The company conducted medical research and provided health consultations for these firms. Despite identifying health risks associated with asbestos exposure, such as asbestosis, MetLife’s reports often downplayed the dangers or remained confidential, limiting broader public awareness of the risks.
- Conflicted Interests: MetLife faced a conflict of interest as it provided both insurance coverage and medical advice to asbestos companies. This dual role has been criticized for potentially influencing MetLife to minimize the perceived severity of asbestos-related health risks to avoid financial liability and maintain good relations with its corporate clients.
- Delay in Public Awareness: Critics argue that MetLife’s actions helped delay public awareness and regulatory action on asbestos. By not fully disclosing the health risks associated with asbestos exposure, MetLife contributed to the continued use of asbestos in various industries, affecting countless workers and consumers.
- Legal and Public Scrutiny: MetLife’s involvement with the asbestos industry and its handling of asbestos-related health risks have been subjects of legal scrutiny and public criticism. The company has been involved in litigation related to its role in assessing and communicating the health hazards of asbestos exposure.
- Impact on Workers’ Health: The delay in recognizing and acting upon the health risks of asbestos exposure contributed to the continued exposure of workers to asbestos, leading to an increase in cases of asbestosis, lung cancer, and mesothelioma.
Raybestos-Manhattan Inc. role in Asbestos Dangers Cover-Up
- Manufacturing and Use of Asbestos: Raybestos-Manhattan was heavily involved in the production of asbestos-containing materials, particularly brake linings and other automotive parts. The company’s products were widely used across various industries, contributing to the widespread exposure of workers and consumers to asbestos fibers.
- Knowledge of Health Risks: Similar to other companies in the asbestos industry, Raybestos-Manhattan was aware of the health risks associated with asbestos exposure. Evidence suggests that the company had internal knowledge of the dangers of asbestos, including the potential for it to cause serious respiratory diseases and cancer, long before this information was made public.
- Suppression of Information: Reports indicate that Raybestos-Manhattan, like many of its contemporaries, attempted to suppress or downplay information regarding the health risks of asbestos exposure. This included minimizing the findings of medical studies, influencing scientific research, and lobbying against the regulation of asbestos to protect its business interests.
- Legal Consequences and Litigation: As the health impacts of asbestos exposure became more widely recognized and accepted, Raybestos-Manhattan faced a multitude of lawsuits from workers who had developed asbestos-related diseases. The litigation often centered on allegations that the company failed to warn of the dangers of asbestos and knowingly exposed workers to hazardous conditions.
- Bankruptcy and Asbestos Trust Fund: Facing an overwhelming number of asbestos-related lawsuits, the company, like many others in the industry, eventually filed for bankruptcy. Part of the bankruptcy proceedings included the establishment of a trust fund to compensate victims of asbestos exposure, following a pattern seen with other companies involved in asbestos litigation.
Raybestos-Manhattan’s actions contributed to the broader narrative of industrial negligence and the deliberate concealment of asbestos health risks.
- Use of Asbestos in Products: Bendix extensively used asbestos in its brake and clutch linings due to the material’s heat-resistant properties, which were ideal for high-friction automotive parts. This widespread use contributed to significant asbestos exposure among auto mechanics and workers in manufacturing plants.
- Awareness and Suppression of Information: Similar to other companies in the asbestos industry, Bendix was aware of the health risks associated with asbestos exposure. There is evidence to suggest that the company had internal knowledge of these risks but chose to suppress or downplay this information to avoid regulatory scrutiny and financial liability.
- Internal Communications: Documents and internal memos from Bendix have shown that the company was aware of the dangers of asbestos as early as the 1960s and 1970s. However, they continued to manufacture and market asbestos-containing products without adequate warnings or protective measures for workers and consumers.
- Litigation and Legal Challenges: Bendix faced numerous lawsuits from individuals who developed asbestos-related diseases, such as mesothelioma and asbestosis, after working with or around Bendix products. These legal challenges highlighted the company’s failure to warn of the dangers associated with asbestos exposure and its role in the cover-up.
- Impact on Public Health and Industry Practices: The actions of Bendix, along with other companies involved in the asbestos industry, had a significant impact on public health. They also contributed to the eventual regulatory changes and increased awareness of the hazards of asbestos, leading to stricter controls and the phasing out of asbestos in many applications.
Bendix’s role in the asbestos dangers cover-up is a part of the larger narrative of industrial and corporate practices that prioritized business interests over health and safety. The legacy of these actions continues to affect individuals and families impacted by asbestos-related diseases.
Injured by Asbestos Exposure?
Information and commentary provided by Dallas Fort Worth Personal Injury and Asbestos and Mesothelioma Attorney Dr. Shezad Malik. The Dr. Shezad Malik Law Firm can be contacted in Dallas at 214-390-3189. If you or a loved one has been injured from Asbestos Mesothelioma or Asbestosis, please fill out our contact card for a free consultation.
Our law firm’s principal office is in Dallas and we have offices in Fort Worth, Texas. Dr. Shezad Malik Law Firm represents clients in dangerous drug and dangerous medical device lawsuits nationwide.
The Dr. Shezad Malik Law Firm handles Asbestos Mesothelioma cancer cases, including asbestos exposure and asbestos lung cancer claims all over Texas and the United States.