Picture of Dr. Shezad Malik

Dr Shezad Malik Law Firm has offices based in Fort Worth and Dallas and represents people who have suffered catastrophic and serious personal injuries including wrongful death, caused by the negligence or recklessness of others. We specialize in Personal Injury trial litigation and focus our energy and efforts on those we represent.

Recently a South Carolina woman filed a product liability lawsuit against Pfizer, claiming that the cholesterol drug Lipitor side effect caused her to develop diabetes. The federal lawsuit was filed by Margaret Clark in the U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina. Clark alleges that Pfizer has failed to adequately warn about the diabetes risk from Lipitor. Pfizer updated the label in 2012 at the request of the FDA.

Lipitor-Diabetes-Side-Effect-Attorney.jpg

Clark was prescribed the cholesterol drug in 2002 to help reduce her risk of heart disease. Clark indicates that she had a body mass index of 22.7, which is considered a normal weight. Clark alleges that she took Lipitor to help maintain her healthy and active lifestyle, but instead the drug allegedly caused her type 2 diabetes in February 2012.

Many women are filing Lipitor lawsuits after developing diabetes. The plaintiff complaints allege that Pfizer failed to adequately warn consumers or doctors about the risks and side effects with Lipitor and the importance of closely monitoring blood glucose levels.

According to experts, Johnson & Johnson, the parent company of DePuy Orthopaedics, is facing more than 4,000 lawsuits over the DePuy Pinnacle hip device. The 4,000 plus plaintiffs, allege that the DePuy Pinnacle metal-on-metal design is defective and prone to premature failure and metallosis caused by the release of metal trash as the metal components grind against each other.

dallas_hip_recall_attorney.jpg

DePuy ASR and Pinnacle Federal MDL

The DePuy Orthopaedics subsidiary is exposed to two separate gigantic multidistrict litigations, known as MDLs. The Depuy ASR lawsuits are centralized in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio. The DePuy Pinnacle lawsuits are centralized in the U.S. District for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas division.

According to recent court documents, Johnson & Johnson, the parent company of DePuy Orthopaedics, is exposed to more than 4,000 lawsuits over the DePuy Pinnacle hip device. The 4,000 plus plaintiffs, allege that the DePuy Pinnacle metal-on-metal design is defective and prone to premature failure and metallosis caused by the release of metal trash as the metal components grind against each other.

fort_worth_personal_injury_attorney-2.jpg

DePuy ASR and Pinnacle Federal MDL

The DePuy Orthopaedics subsidiary is exposed to two separate gigantic multidistrict litigations, known as MDLs. The Depuy ASR lawsuits are centralized in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio. The DePuy Pinnacle lawsuits are centralized in the U.S. District for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas division.

The first of four separate federal trials involving problems with Bard Avaulta mesh will begin in June 2013. U.S. District Judge Joseph R. Goodwin ordered that the first four Bard Avaulta lawsuits in the federal MDL will be tried individually.

vaginal-mesh-injury-lawyer.jpg

Judge Goodwin is overseeing the vaginal mesh injury cases in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia. Here all federal lawsuits over Bard Avaulta mesh have been centralized as part of an MDL, or multi-district litigation.

The first Bard Avaulta trial in the federal court system will involve a lawsuit filed by Donna and Dan Cisson. The first trial date is scheduled to begin on June 11, 2013.

Recent medical research suggests that certain type 2 diabetic medications, known as Incretin Mimetics, including Januvia, Janumet, Byetta, Bydureon and Victoza, are potentially linked to an increased risk of pancreatic cancer side effects when compared to other diabetes treatment.

byetta-pancreatic-cancer.jpg

Incretin Mimetic Investigation Timeline

April 18, 2013 – Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP) released a disturbing report. ISMP, monitors FDA MedWatch reports, focused on Byetta, Victoza, Januvia, Onglza and Tradjenta. Based on the report, ISMP is calling for stronger alerts on the prescribing information, as well as new studies on the long-term effects of these diabetes treatment drugs and the association with thyroid and pancreatic cancer.

The California state court judge has tossed last week’s Actos bladder cancer verdict and has reversed the $6.5 million damage award. The judge issued a post-trial ruling rejecting key expert witness testimony.

Actos_Bladder_Cancer_Attorney.jpg

Last week, the Los Angeles County jury awarded plaintiff Jack Cooper $6.5 million for his bladder cancer injuries from Actos side effects. The trial lasted more than 2 months and Cooper argued that Takeda Pharmaceuticals, the manufacturer of Actos, failed to adequately warn about the Actos cancer risk and claimed that use of the medication for more than two years resulted in his November 2011 diagnosis of bladder cancer.

Superior Court Judge Kenneth Freeman issued an Order tossing the jury verdict after determining that expert testimony was inadmissible. Judge Freeman determined that causation was not established in Cooper’s case. Judge Freeman said the medical expert (Dr Smith) relied on unreliable studies and did not give enough weight to Cooper’s risk factors. Cooper aged 60 and was a former smoker, a major risk factor which Takeda says probably played a larger role in his risk of bladder cancer than Actos.

According to the Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP)’s Quarter Watch report, the number of pancreatic cancer cases are increasing involving lethal side effects of Byetta, Januvia, Victoza and other diabetes drugs known as incretin mimetics.

byetta-pancreatic-cancer.jpg

ISMP evaluates adverse event reports submitted to the FDA, and the report, Perspectives on GLP-1 Agents For Diabetes, evaluated adverse event reports for exenatide (Byetta and Bydureon), liraglutide (Victoza), sitagliptin (Januvia and Janumet), saxagliptin (Onglyza) and linagliptin (Tradjenta).

The yearly adverse event report data ending June 2012, demonstrated that there were at least 1,723 serious adverse events submitted through the FDA’s MedWatch program. There were at least 105 pancreatic cancer cases and 831 reports of pancreatitis. Pancreatitis or inflammation of the pancreas gland is an important risk factor for the development of pancreas cancer.

The U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) has received a request to consolidate all federal pancreatic cancer lawsuits. These were filed by patients using Januvia, Janumet, Byetta and Victoza incretin mimetic diabetic drugs and they allege that they developed pancreatic cancer.

Januvia-Pancreatic-Cancer-Attorney.jpg
The injured pancreatic cancer plaintiffs have requested that all cases be centralized before U.S. District Judge Battaglia in the Southern District of California for coordinated proceedings as part of multidistrict litigation. The plaintiffs would like one single MDL be created for all Byetta, Januvia, Janumet and Victoza lawsuits, as opposed to having four separate MDLs established.

What are Incretin Mimetic Class of Drugs?

Merck & Co. (MRK) is defending a woman’s claim that its osteoporosis drug Fosamax weakened her femur, causing her leg to break when she fell in her driveway. This is the second Fosamax femur fracture injury claim going to trial. The first trial, in state court in Atlantic City, New Jersey, was called off after plaintiff Christina Su suffered a “sudden illness” that was unrelated to her use of Fosamax.

fort_worth_fosamax_fracture_attorney.jpg

A three-week jury trial has started before U.S. District Judge Joel Pisano in Trenton, New Jersey. The plaintiff, Bernadette Glynn fell and injured herself in April 2009. Merck claimed that Glynn, 58, tripped over a chainsaw in her garage and that the fracture is typical of women with osteoporosis.

Fosamax and Femur Fracture Allegations

The U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) has issued an order to consolidate all Mirena IUD injury perforation injury lawsuits. This order applies to all cases filed throughout the federal court system. All Mirena IUD injury cases will be centralized before one judge as part of an MDL, or multidistrict litigation.

Mirena-IUD-Perforation-attorney.jpg

According to the JPML order, all defective Mirena IUD product liability lawsuits will be transferred to U.S. District Judge Cathy Seibel in the Southern District of New York for coordinated handling during pretrial proceedings.

What is Mirena IUD?

Contact Information